In the modern age of a self-assured and independent India, the continued use of colonial-era prefixes like “VT” (Victorian Territory or Viceroy Territory) on Indian aircraft and “VU” (Victorian Union) for ham radio callsigns serves as a persistent reminder of a bygone era of British control. While other countries that were once under British rule have embraced national codes that reflect their sovereignty, India remains bound by these vestiges, which hinders a fully realized national identity. This outdated system needs an overhaul to reflect the dignity, sovereignty, and heritage of India, now known widely as “Bharat.”
The Colonial Legacy of VT and VU Prefixes
The VT prefix was assigned to India in 1929 under the International Radiotelegraph Convention. This designation—representing “Victorian Territory” or “Viceroy Territory”—was chosen by British rulers as a marker for Indian aircraft at a time when the country was part of the British Empire. Despite India’s independence in 1947, the VT code has remained in use, placing Indian aircraft under a title that implies colonial submission. Similarly, ham radio callsigns in India begin with the prefix “VU,” (Victorian Union) yet another relic of British control.
Efforts to change these codes date back decades. The Civil Aviation Ministry has previously approached the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) for a new prefix, but with limited success. Alternative codes such as “BH” (for Bharat) or “HI” (for Hindustan) were sought, but were either unavailable or rejected. Other former British colonies, such as Sri Lanka (4R), Pakistan (AP), and China (B), have successfully transitioned to nationalized prefixes. India’s inability to do the same has raised questions of national pride and identity, sparking public interest and legal petitions.
Legal and Public Push for Change
Recent legal efforts to change the VT prefix include public interest litigation (PIL) cases filed in Indian courts, requesting government action to replace the colonial-era designation. In 2022, a PIL was filed in the Delhi High Court by BJP leader Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, arguing that the VT code undermines Indian sovereignty, dignity, and constitutional values. The petition emphasized that this code reflects a colonial mentality incompatible with a modern, democratic India. Although similar petitions have been dismissed in the past, there is increasing momentum as citizens and lawmakers recognize the symbolic importance of eliminating colonial remnants from national identifiers.
Practical Steps for Replacing VT and VU Prefixes
Changing these prefixes is no simple task, as the ICAO, which oversees global aviation standards, requires countries to use unique national codes for aircraft registration. India’s ideal prefixes, such as “BH” or “IN,” may not be immediately available due to restrictions in the international aviation community. However, the government could engage in sustained diplomatic efforts with the ICAO, presenting the case for a transition that aligns with India’s independent identity. Negotiating for a more culturally resonant alternative, like “BA” for Bharat, could eventually replace VT if an international agreement is reached.
Similarly, the “VU” prefix for ham radio could be replaced with a more relevant prefix through coordinated negotiations with international telecommunications organizations. Ham radio operators in India, who are an active community with a significant role in communications during emergencies, have long felt that “VU” does not adequately represent India’s identity in the modern world.
Implications of Maintaining or Changing These Codes
Maintaining colonial prefixes contradicts India’s constitutional values and aspirations of self-determination, sovereignty, and cultural integrity. National symbols, including these codes, play a powerful role in international representation, influencing how India is perceived globally. As the country advances on the world stage—economically, politically, and culturally—it is crucial for national identifiers to mirror its modern ethos and values.
Conclusion: Reclaiming India’s Identity
Replacing the VT and VU prefixes is more than just a symbolic change; it is a move toward reclaiming India’s identity on its own terms. India has transformed significantly since gaining independence, evolving into a global power with a rich cultural heritage. Adopting national codes that align with Bharat’s present-day identity will reinforce its stance as an autonomous and sovereign nation. As the country celebrates 75 years of independence, it is time to shed outdated labels and embrace a future that is truly reflective of its journey and aspirations.
